Jim Stevenson – business marketing technology


How Teenagers Consume Media by Matthew Robson

This is the full copy of the research note written by 15 year old Matthew Robson

Radio

Most teenagers nowadays are not regular listeners to radio. They may occasionally tune in, but they do not try to listen to a program specifically. The main reason teenagers listen to the radio is for music, but now with online sites streaming music for free they do not bother, as services such as last.fm do this advert free, and users can choose the songs they want instead of listening to what the radio presenter/DJ chooses.

Television

Most teenagers watch television, but usually there are points in the year where they watch more than average. This is due to programs coming on in seasons, so they will watch a particular show at a certain time for a number of weeks (as long as it lasts) but then they may watch no television for weeks after the program has ended.

Teenage boys (generally) watch more TV when it is the football season, often watching two games and related shows a week (totalling about 5 hours of viewing). A portion of teenagers watches programs that are regular (such as soap operas) at least five times a week for half an hour or so but this portion is shrinking, as it is hard to find the time each day.

Teenagers are also watching less television because of services such as BBC iPlayer, which allows them to watch shows when they want. Whilst watching TV, adverts come on quite regularly (18 minutes of every hour) and teenagers do not want to watch these, so they switch to another channel, or do something else whilst the adverts run.

The majority of teenagers I speak to have Virgin Media as their provider, citing lower costs but similar content of Sky. A fraction of teenagers have Freeview but these people are light users of TV (they watch about 1 ½ hours per week) so they do not require the hundreds of channels that other providers offer.

Newspapers

No teenager that I know of regularly reads a newspaper, as most do not have the time and cannot be bothered to read pages and pages of text while they could watch the news summarised on the internet or on TV.

The only newspapers that are read are tabloids and freesheets (Metro, London Lite…) mainly because of cost; teenagers are very reluctant to pay for a newspaper (hence the popularity of freesheets such as the Metro). Over the last few weeks, the Sun has decreased in cost to 20p, so I have seen more and more copies read by teenagers. Another reason why mainly tabloids are read is that their compact size allows them to be read easily, on a bus or train. This is especially true for The Metro, as it is distributed on buses and trains.

Gaming

Whilst the stereotypical view of gamers is teenage boys, the emergence of the Wii onto the market has created a plethora of girl gamers and younger (6+) gamers. The most common console is the Wii, then the Xbox 360 followed by the PS3. Most teenagers with a games console tend to game not in short bursts, but in long stints (upwards of an hour).

As consoles are now able to connect to the internet, voice chat is possible between users, which has had an impact on phone usage; one can speak for free over the console and so a teenager would be unwilling to pay to use a phone.

PC gaming has little or no place in the teenage market. This may be because usually games are released across all platforms, and whilst one can be sure a game will play on a console PC games require expensive set ups to ensure a game will play smoothly. In addition, PC games are relatively easy to pirate and download for free, so many teenagers would do this rather than buy a game. In contrast, it is near impossible to obtain a console game for free.

Internet

Every teenager has some access to the internet, be it at school or home. Home use is mainly used for fun (such as social

networking) whilst school (or library) use is for work. Most teenagers are heavily active on a combination of social networking sites. Facebook is the most common, with nearly everyone with an internet connection registered and visiting >4 times a week. Facebook is popular as one can interact with friends on a wide scale. On the other hand, teenagers do not use twitter. Most have signed up to the service, but then just leave it as they realise that they are not going to update it (mostly because texting twitter uses up credit, and they would rather text friends with that credit). In addition, they realise that no one is viewing their profile, so their ‘tweets’ are pointless.

Outside of social networking, the internet is used primarily as a source of information for a variety of topics. For searching the web, Google is the dominant figure, simply because it is well known and easy to use. Some teenagers make purchases on the internet (on sites like eBay) but this is only used by a small percentage, as a credit card is required and most teenagers do not have credit cards. Many teenagers use YouTube to watch videos (usually anime which cannot be watched anywhere else) and some use it as a music player by having a video with the music they want to listen to playing in the background.

Directories

Teenagers never use real directories (hard copy catalogues such as yellow pages). This is because real directories contain listings for builders and florists, which are services that teenagers do not require. They also do not use services such as 118 118 because it is quite expensive and they can get the information for free on the internet, simply by typing it into Google.

Viral/Outdoor Marketing

Most teenagers enjoy and support viral marketing, as often it creates humorous and interesting content. Teenagers see adverts on websites (pop ups, banner ads) as extremely annoying and pointless, as they have never paid any attention to them and they are portrayed in such a negative light that no one follows them.

Outdoor advertising usually does not trigger a reaction in teenagers, but sometimes they will oppose it (the Benetton baby adverts). Most teenagers ignore conventional outside advertising (billboards etc) because they have seen outside adverts since they first stepped outside and usually it is not targeted at them (unless it’s for a film). However, campaigns such as the GTA: IV characters painted on the side of buildings generate interest because they are different and cause people to stop and think about the advert, maybe leading to further research.

Music

Teenagers listen to a lot of music, mostly whilst doing something else (like travelling or using a computer). This makes it hard to get an idea of the proportion of their time that is spent listening to music.

They are very reluctant to pay for it (most never having bought a CD) and a large majority (8/10) downloading it illegally from file sharing sites. Legal ways to get free music that teenagers use are to listen to the radio, watch music TV channels (not very popular, as these usually play music at certain times, which is not always when teenagers are watching) and use music streaming websites (as I mentioned previously).

Almost all teenagers like to have a ‘hard copy’ of the song (a file of the song that they can keep on their computer and use at will) so that they can transfer it to portable music players and share it with friends.

How teenagers play their music while on the go varies, and usually dependent on wealth –with teenagers from higher income families using iPods and those from lower income families using mobile phones. Some teenagers use both to listen to music, and there are always exceptions to the rule.

A number of people use the music service iTunes (usually in conjunction with iPods) to acquire their music (legally) but again this is unpopular with many teenagers because of the ‘high price’ (79p per song). Some teenagers use a combination of sources to obtain music, because sometimes the sound quality is better on streaming sites but they cannot use these sites whilst offline, so they would download a song then listen to it on music streaming sites (separate from the file).

Cinema

Teenagers visit the cinema quite often, regardless of what is on. Usually they will target a film first, and set out to see that, but sometimes they will just go and choose when they get there. This is because going to the cinema is not usually about the film, but the experience –and getting together with friends. Teenagers visit the cinema more often when they are in the lower end of teendom (13 and 14) but as they approach 15 they go to the cinema a lot less. This is due to the pricing; at 15 they have to pay the adult price, which is often double the child price. Also, it is possible to buy a pirated DVD of the film at the time of release, and these cost much less than a cinema ticket so teenagers often choose this instead of going to the cinema. Some teenagers choose to download the films off the internet, but this is not favourable as the films are usually bad quality, have to be watched on a small computer screen and there is a chance that they will be malicious files and install a virus.

Devices

Mobile Phones

99% of teenagers have a mobile phone and most are quite capable phones. The general view is that Sony Ericsson phones are superior, due to their long list of features, built in walkman capability and value (£100 will buy a mid-high range model). Teenagers due to the risk of it getting lost do not own mobile phones over the £200 mark. As a rule, teenagers have phones on pay as you go. This is because they cannot afford the monthly payments, and cannot commit to an 18-month contract. Usually, teenagers only use their phone for texting, calling.

Features such as video messaging or video calling are not used –because they are expensive, (you can get four regular texts for the price of one video message). Services such as instant messaging are used, but not by everyone. It usually depends whether the phone is Wi-Fi compatible, because otherwise it is very expensive to get internet off the phone network. As most teenagers’ phones have Bluetooth support, and Bluetooth is free, they utilise this feature often. It is used to send songs and videos (even though it is illegal) and is another way teenagers gain songs for free. Teenagers never use the ringtone and picture selling services, which gained popularity in the early 00s. This is because of the negative press that these services have attracted (where the charge £20 a week with no easy way to cancel the service) and the fact that they can get pictures and music on a computer –then transfer it to their phones at no cost. Mobile email is not used as teenagers have no need; they do not need to be connected to their inbox all the time as they don’t receive important emails. Teenagers do not use the internet features on their mobiles as it costs too much, and generally, if they waited an hour they could use their home internet and they are willing to wait as they don’t usually have anything urgent to do.

Teenagers do not upgrade their phone very often, with most upgrading every two years. They usually upgrade on their birthday when their parents will buy them a new phone, as they do not normally have enough money to do it themselves.

Televisions

Most teenagers own a TV, with more and more upgrading to HD ready flat screens. However, many are not utilising this HD functionality, as HD channels are expensive extras which many families cannot justify the added expenditure. Many of them don’t want to sign up to HD broadcasting services, as adverts are shown on standard definition broadcasts, so they can’t see the difference. Most people have Virgin Media as a TV provider. Some have Sky and some have Freeview but very few only have the first five channels (BBC One, BBC Two, ITV, Channel Four and Channel Five).

Computers

Every teenager has access to a basic computer with internet, but most teenagers computers are systems capable of only everyday tasks. Nearly all teenagers’ computers have Microsoft office installed, as it allows them to do school work at home. Most (9/10) computers owned by teenagers are PCs, because they are much cheaper than Macs and school computers run Windows, so if a Mac is used at home compatibility issues arise.

Games Consoles

Close to a third of teenagers have a new (<2 ½ years old) games console, 50% having a Wii, 40% with an Xbox 360 and 10% with a PS3. The PS3 has such a low figure because of its high price (£300) and similar features and games to an Xbox 360, which costs less (£160). The Wii’s dominance is due to younger brothers and sisters, they have a Wii and parents are not willing to pay for another console.

What is hot?

• Anything with a touch screen is desirable.

• Mobile phones with large capacities for music.

• Portable devices that can connect to the internet (iPhones)

• Really big tellies

What is not?

• Anything with wires

• Phones with black and white screens

• Clunky ‘brick’ phones

• Devices with less than ten-hour battery life



How Teenagers Consume Media: the report that shook the City

I, like most other people was very interested in reports of the Matthew Robson’s report on teenage media habits.

Here’s a link to the full report published by the Guardian newspaper.



Amazon Online Sales Defy Slump – Good News

I read this article in The Sunday Times which is optimistic for everyone in the Digital Industry as the credit crunch turns into a recession!



Google Chrome, is it a Browser or is it a Platform

I’ve been listening to all the talk about Google Chrome, the cool little demonstration videos and the EULA back tracking and find it all very interesting.

I have to say I haven’t used Chrome yet but that’s okay because this isn’t a product review.

I’m most interested because everyone is calling Chrome a Browser and I’m not sure it is.

John C Dvorak, has said he thinks this will lead to a Google operating system but I’m not sure this isn’t the operating system itself, loosely anyway.

Maybe I’m linking elements together incorrectly but for me you have to consider 3 elements and the impact they will have on the Technology Industry and beyond.

First, Google Apps, essentially a Software as a Service (SaaS) model. Why bother with Microsoft Office if you can have all your applications on the Internet and using Google’s computing power rather than you own.

This is what is being called ‘the cloud’, Apple have their MobileMe platform allowing you to store your files on the Internet so that you can access them from anywhere.

All of these services are trying to achieve the same thing, use the Internet more, use it for storage, processing, synchronisation etc.

Secondly, there is Internet access and generally it is getting quicker and more available away from your office or home; there is WiFi, WiMax, 3G etc

Third there are the devices themselves. Asus Eee PC, the really small PC using a Linux based operating system. With this you don’t get a huge amount of power but it’s very portable and hey if your going to use Google’s Servers for your processing needs why do you want a big laptop when a small one will do.

Also there is the iPhone, which I’m using to write this post, or Google Android or whatever the competition comes up with in the future. These devices are pretty much connected to the Internet or could be 24 7.

So put them all together and what you get is ultra small and ultra mobile devices which are incredibly powerful (they have the power of Google’s servers) and they are constantly connected to the internet for browsing, email, letters and reports, spreadsheets, presentations or data access.

You can choose a pocket sized smart phone or a more traditional laptop style or indeed an ultra mobile, a tablet, or if you prefer a windows PC or a media centre to give you access to your Video on Demand service.

The choice is yours, to suit your needs and your budget.

So why do you want to pay for that ultra fast PC, unless you are gaming, or why do you want the power of Microsoft Windows or Office when it’s all more conveniently on the cloud and you can access it anywhere via the same interface and applications you are used to. You can access you office files without the need to bring them home in your brief case and you can access your home files to see how much you need to pay that bill for.

There are of course some down sides to this scenario but most of these will be fixed over time.

What do you do when you don’t have access to the Internet, I travel most days by London Underground, and until they get WiFi it’s going to be dead time in this scenario.

Also there are security and EULA issues.

Finally there are alternatives, kind of, why not put all your files on a memory stick and if you need applications you can use a U3 memory stick to take your desktop with you from computer to computer.

So is Google chrome a browser or a platform giving you access to the cloud and all of your computing needs through any device running it.

As always, we live in exciting times, which is why I love tech and my job so much.



The Future of Video Enhancement
August 16, 2008, 6:34 pm
Filed under: Technology | Tags: , , ,

Have a look at this Demo video:

The software was produced by Pravin Bhat, student at the University of Washington’s computer science department, amongst others and it is truly a step forward in video.

Having said that I’d like to know what the commercial use of this is.  You would hope that video technology would progress so that this technique is not needed and it’s highly unlikely that you took high quality still photo’s to go along with your old videos.

Having said that all cool new technology has to start somewhere and this is a fantastic start!



Beijing Olympics 2008 in 3D
August 10, 2008, 9:44 am
Filed under: Creative, Technology | Tags: , , , , , ,

I came across this video in YouTube, it’s very cool.

There are more detailed views of each stadium here http://uk.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=21268C9ED4C74417.

The more I look at the work done by Beijing Olympics the more I think the standards bar has been raised very high and I’m not sure London 2012 will be able to reach the same standards.

I will also be very interesting to see what digital activities London 2012 have planned.



Finally, a Good Use for Second Life
June 2, 2008, 8:59 pm
Filed under: Creative, Technology | Tags: , ,

I’m not a great fan of Second Life, I generally think it was over hyped, whenever I looked at the number of users it didn’t add up to the figures in all the press, as well is that it appears to be just a gimmick.  I’ve done a few reviews on behalf of clients and every time the cost just doesn’t justify what they would get out of it.

Anyway, that aside, this is a great use for Second Life, http://tinyurl.com/4u8yz7.

There are lots of issues with this, mainly who else is going to be “in” Second Life for patients to talk to, but what a step forward in entertainment for the paralysed.



Is good Customer Service really so difficult for HP!
April 9, 2008, 1:15 pm
Filed under: Business, Technology | Tags: , , , , ,

I apologise, this is going to be a bit of a rant but hang in there I’m sure there is a point to the story at the end.

I own an HP Tablet PC, which I bought about a year ago from PC World in the UK for about £1200.  I found that when I used it as a Tablet rather than a Laptop I got about 10 minutes into using it and got some IRQ or some such error, which forced a re-boot.  I took the Laptop back to PC World who after 2 hours of doing there own checks confirmed I was correct and finally agreed to replace to Laptop.

I got this second Laptop back home and found it to have the same issues, some IRQ error and re-boot.

Having got feed up I moved to Mac’s and to be honest am extremely happy I have done so.  So for the last year I have been a happy Mac guy for the first time in 20 years of using computers.

Anyway, the thought of using a Tablet entered my head again and or course the Laptop was expensive so I wanted to give it another go.  Still the same problem, so I contact HP customer support via email, who were very helpful and asked me to do some diagnosis and determined that the error was caused by a faulty hard drive.

They organised someone to pick it up and informed me I’d get it back in 7 to 10 days.

3 weeks went by so I called them on a Tuesday.  A Problem with the serial number meant they hadn’t even started repairs.  After informing them that I wasn’t happy, as they hadn’t informed me of any issues, I was told to call again on Friday.

I called to be informed there was an issue with the serial number and they hadn’t even started repairs.  Again after informing them that I wasn’t happy I was told someone would chase this on and call me on the Monday and let me know what was happening.

No call was received, no missed call was received.

I did receive a note from a courier service on the Tuesday saying they had tried to delivery a package but I wasn’t in so they would try again the next business day, which was today.

Package arrived about 13:00 ish.

Excitedly I reattached the battery, power etc and started to play with the Tablet, moving icons, deleted some stuff and installing Skype, the installer was already on the desktop.  Arrrrgh, IRQ error and re-boot.

I called the Repair centre only to be told they were outsourced and I had to call HP but I could ask to get put straight through to Customer Complaints.  Kindly they gave me the number to save me looking it up.

I called, needed the HP reference then got put through to Customer Complaints who offered to have the Laptop collected for repair again and I’d get it back in 7 to 10 days.

When I suggested that I had no confidence as this is what happened previously and I was looking for an additional level of assurance that it would be fixed rather than a repeat of my previous experience I was told no one in HP could give me that assurance.  When I asked to speak to a supervisor I was told I was.  When I asked to speak to a manager I was told they were not customer facing.  The Customer Complaint lady (she was young but don’t want to be rude and call her a girl) told me that she would pass on my complaints.   Okay, good, what assurance do I have that my Laptop is going to be repaired and repaired properly, none was the answer she could not give me that assurance but did I want her to arrange some to collect it and put it in for repairs, I’d get it back in 7 to 10 days!

I explained she was missing the point and was told she wasn’t going to argue with me anymore, did I want her to arrange someone to call me, excitedly I thought finally someone who can help, no the call was to arrange to time to collect the Laptop for repairs.

Talk about useless!  I’m extremely frustrated but trying to be clear.

The point is that I can buy any number of laptops, I can go to any number of suppliers, in this age, Marketers call it ‘New Luxury’ its all about the service companies give consumers and a key part of that is handling repairs and complaints.

I read an article about the Vigilante Consumers in Business Week I think, more about that later, but essentially it was how companies are providing such a poor service that consumers have to harass the Executive’s, not customer service in order to get anything fixed.  I think the main focus of the article was Comcast in the US.

Until companies realise that service is a key differentiator they are going to struggle.

Come on HP get your act in order!

Update – 28 April 2008:

HP collected the Laptop on the 10th of April with the promise of returning it fixed in 7 to 10 days, sound familiar!

I called today, 12 days after collection to be told there was a problem with the Serial Number so it had only just been passed to a Senior Engineer and they could not tell me when I would get it back. He has sent a note to his supervisor asking if they can prioritise this repair.

They have promised to give me a call back with a date to return the Laptop.

I can accept that HP would not have time to redesign their Customer Service since my first encounter, you would have thought that Customer Complaints would have a bit more impact and that the Laptop would have already been prioritised without the need for me to call again!

I really don’t want this to be a rants and raves blog but I do think as well as allow me to vent my frustration, it is also useful as a case study for how companies miss obvious elements of an integrated consumer experience and so let all their efforts down.

Update 29 April 2008:

I have to give credit where credit is due, I got a call from Richard from HP as he promised. Unfortunately there is no news but hey a call as promised is just the quality of customer service which makes a company a great company.

Update 1 May 2008:

Another call from HP this time n behalf of the Senior Engineer to inform me that they can’t replicate the fault. A bit frustrating considering that they have now had the Laptop for over 6 weeks but after the call two days ago I can cut them some slack.

A bit more frustrating is that they cannot replicate the fault by running a load test! The issue was originally diagnosed as a hard drive fault but for me only happens when I turn the Laptop into a Tablet.

Anyway they are off trying to find the fault again.

Update 12 May 2008:

Finally had the Laptop returned and it appears to be working. I’m really pleased.  Looking at the repair note I notice that they have pretty much replaced everything except the hard-drive which they replaced last time.

I do have to laugh though. When I got the Laptop back the first time I also received a note which showed the condition of the laptop, meaning the number of scratches on the case.  The first time HP noted about 10 scratches, the second time they noted about 35 and in between the Laptop was in my possession for less than 24 hours and in use for less than 30 minutes!  Anyway the scratches are so minor I’m struggling to see them at all.

Hopefully that’s the saga over and I’m going to stop ranting about this.

It is worthwhile however, to keep in mind that Customer Service is as an important part of a Brand and the Brand Image as the next TV Stop or Digital Advertising Campaign!



iPhone Killer
April 7, 2008, 12:44 pm
Filed under: Business, Creative, Mobile, Technology | Tags: , , , ,

I love my iPhone but this is the iPhone Killer!

Amazingly this was created in 2005, not surprisingly its an Award Winner.

The reason I like this so much is that it’s not been constrained by current technology but has looked at what users need and has been designed to accommodate this.

Can’t wait for the hardware technology to catch up!



London Tube Smartcard (Oyster) Cracked

The RFID System used by the London Tube Smartcard, the Oyster card, has been cracked.  The system Mifare Classic is used on the Dutch Transit system and possibly in Milan also.

To those who know, it looks like this is just down to a bad design, and potentially there are more serious security vulnerabilities waiting to be discovered.

Details of the hack are here.

The System uses its own cryptography and one of the recommendations to fix this is to use publicly scrutinised cryptography, which by implication is more robust and secure against attack.

There are a number of questions that arise from this:

  •  How many of the organisations affected have Contingency Plans in place for this or similar occurrences;
  • One of the signs of a good customer care organisation is how they deal with issues when they arise.  I wonder what Mifare’s response will be, and if they have any plans, which would mean all their customers can implement the same solution globally;
  • How will Transit Organisations react, I fear by imposing more manual checks which will inconvenience there customers, causing delays;
  • How quickly will hackers and organised crime get involved to start cashing in, and producing hacked cards for sale;
  • In the UK Barclaycard have produced a credit card with an integral Oyster, this will no doubt have an effect on the consumer confidence of this card and Barclaycards developments to a truly contactless credit card, although Barclaycard have pointed out that the credit card system is built on different technology provided by Visa.